CELEBRATING: SERMONS

18 - Jan 2009
A sermon delivered by Rev. Gordon How

Back to Sermons

Jan. 18, 2009 That All May Be One

Every church building has its own design characteristics. This sanctuary, for example, is set out with pews all the same and in straight rows. Its features are the light, the height of the vaulted ceiling reaching to the heavens and the bountiful windows. Often, the architecture of a church is rooted in the particular theology of the church. This could be, for example, the basic footprint of the church - whether it be a cross, a circle, a semi-circle or whatever. It reveals some principle or emphasis of the belief of the people who worship therein.

Next weekend, we are to be visited by a Church Architect who has been invited here to make some suggestions to a committee that is considering what changes, if any, to recommend regarding the chancel of the church - this area at the front where the ministers and musicians lead worship. The timing is right because our organ is behind in its regular maintenance. It hasn't been renewed and cleaned for decades. Included is a consideration of changing the east wall of the sanctuary (below the stained glass window) to enhance three things: 1) the sound quality coming from the organ pipes; 2) the appearance of the brown plywood wall of squares (which really only looks attractive when something is hanging on it); and 3) the use of the wall for electronic projection of images… I'm sure we will get heavily into these considerations in the coming weeks. I want, today, however, to make comment on two existing architectural features of our sanctuary.

Did you ever wonder why this pulpit has such a place of prominence? For example, it is higher than the lectern, closer to you than the communion table, and is designed as the prominent and fixed element of our sanctuary. The reasons are simple. First, it is because the Protestant church believes the preaching and teaching of the word of God to be the most important aspect of our worship. It is more important to explain the word of God than even to read it from scripture; so the pulpit is higher than the lectern. We can surround our worship with beautiful music, we can enact the sacramental importance of Baptism and Holy Communion - and we can bow in prayer - but the preaching of the Word is to be the prominent aspect of our tradition. The other reason that the pulpit take six steps to climb up into - is because from this elevated position, communication is enhanced - the speaker can be seen - and to be seen helps with being heard.

A second architectural feature to note today - is the rood beam above me here. It's presence is quite a contradiction to our United Church theology. …. You see, we are a church that believes strongly in the priesthood of all believers, in the ministry of the whole people of God; the ordained are no more important than the lay people - but we don't completely reflect that with this architecture. Likely, the architects who design our churches were influenced by either historical church architecture or by their own church backgrounds - which may not have been United Church. Yet, here, we have this beam which sets apart the chancel from the nave (to use two old English terms.)

In medieval churches the primary purpose of a rood screen or rood beam was to be fence or screen to keep the clergy and the laity separated. The lay people were not to be involved in presenting the worship, they could only listen to it from a distance. The holy men of the church were to be kept apart from the masses (or vice-versa, depending on how you look upon these things.) How contradictory that old way of doing things is to our way of being the church. For us, it is the ministry of the whole people of God, with no one more important than anyone else, no hierarchies of importance.

The word rood - as in "rood beam" - is derived from the old Saxon word "rood" meaning "cross". And the rood screen, which later became mostly only a "rood beam" held upon it, a Cross - hence the name rood. However, there was another reason for this rood beam to be placed here - in our church - by the architects. And this reason I can accept, because it is here only to carry a verse of scripture - which is fundamental to the United Church of Canada - in fact, UT OMNES UNUM SINT is the motto of the United Church of Canada and it appears on the crest of our church which is printed for you on the cover of this morning's bulletin. I like this rood beam, because of what it has written on it.

More people ask me about this Latin verse than any other symbol or work of art in our church. We have the glory of the Pentecost window of the west wall, with its depiction of the Fire and Wind of the Holy Spirit descending upon the church; on the East window there are at least a dozen important symbols and high above on the side windows are four repeated symbols from the early church… but it is "Ut Omnes Unum Sint" that creates the most questions… what does it mean?

John 17: 20 'I ask not only on behalf of these, but also on behalf of those who will believe in me through their word, 21that they may all be one. As you, Father, are in me and I am in you, may they also be in us,* so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22The glory that you have given me I have given them, so that they may be one, as we are one, 23I in them and you in me, that they may become completely one, so that the world may know that you have sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me."

So, the you see the inherent contradiction in this rood beam - rood beams were originally to separate Christians one group from the other - whereas, this one is used to highlight "That All May Be One" - the opposite of separating Christians!

I have always celebrated the belief that our United Church is a uniting church. It has been and must continue to be all about bringing people together. Ecumenical and inclusive - acting in unity, and in cooperation with those who share our churches values and hopes. Our church began in 1925 - a union of all the Methodists in Canada, all the Congregationalists in Canada and 2/3rds of the Presbyterians. I mention this today because that scriptural motto is crucial to this Sunday - earmarked throughout the world as the start of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. The week of prayer for Christian Unity was in much more favour 20 and 40 years ago - when local clergy and churches of the Anglican, Roman Catholic, United and Lutheran churches would get together for special services to celebrate an ecumenical spirit of oneness in purpose.

That all seems to have faded rather completely nowadays - I suppose this is a result of a more competitive approach by most churches - a circling of the wagons to aid survival, of setting up theological boundaries that make two categories - insiders and outsiders - and outsiders are not welcome inside, there are not even to be met nor prayed with! It is like our politics now - working against the other political parties is more important than the common good of everyone.
Within the wider church, this lack of ecumenical sharing, programming, worship, attitude and effort is truly a sad loss for me and my understanding of the faith - because I have learned so much from my ecumenical experiences in the past 30 years. I want to tell you about three Christians of other churches I have met over the years and from whom I have learned valuable lessons. They happen to be: an Anglican, a Methodist and a Russian Orthodox.

I met all of them first in 1981 when I traveled to GDR to attend meetings of the planning committee for the 1983 Assembly of the WCC to be held in Vancouver. Dresden, GDR was the first European city I visited - it was still behind the Iron Curtain then, and there 20 of us began the pRussian Orthodox Churchess of planning a meeting to be held two years later in 1983, that would draw together 4000 people to the UBC Campus, for 2/12 weeks.

The Anglican was Bill Perkins - a career ecumenist (or "ecumeniac" as we called him) who had spent most of his life as a bureaucrat in the WCC in Geneva. He could speak 5 languages and knew hundreds of people in the leadership of the members churches throughout the world. He was assertive, he had a memory that kept track of policies, budgets, programs, events, people and places that was swift and sure and impressive. We worked well together and I think the reason was that we respected each other and trusted each other. So that is my first ecumenical lesson - on this Sunday that marks the beginning of the week of Prayer of Christian Unity. In order to work cooperatively and effectively together on the ministry of Jesus Christ, people must respect each other and trust each other.

It has long been a sure lesson of the ecumenical movement that those who move easily in such circles are people who are confident about those own history and own theology that they can creatively engage in conversations with people of other persuasions - because they have trust that God's Spirit will lead them into new working relationships which only serve God's purpose.

Later that year, I went to Geneva to meet again with Bill Perkins and on the first Sunday I was there, he took me to an English speaking Lutheran congregation in the heart of old Geneva. We worship with 200 others, many from the WCC and the LWF who came together to worship in English. They were Methodists from Africa, Presbyterians from Asian, Anglicans from Australia and others from the Pacific Island, the Mediterranean and Scandinavia… It was the most uplifting worship experience of my life. Cross cultural, ecumenical and inclusive… The music, the prayers and the Eucharist were for everyone. It was a delight and it made me think what the "one true church" might just be like.

Another person present at that meeting, who became a life-long friend was Pauline Webb, whom many of you met here two years ago when she and several Methodist friends of London passed through Vancouver one Sunday morning - lifting our spirits and sharing worship with us. Granted Methodists are very similar to us in theology and practice - but Pauline taught me some important lessons about the unity of the church. She is a daughter of a Methodist Minister and she had all the gifts, skills, experience and faith to become a minister - but the Methodist Church of England in those days of the early 50s would not yet ordain women. So Pauline chose to serve the church as a laywoman - and she rose to the top both within her church as its first woman Moderator, but also as a gifted preacher and communicator - both in Methodist circles and in her widely-respected role as BBC Religious Broadcaster. Pauline taught me that the role you play is not as important as how well you do your job! We can't all be elected to the highest office, nor lead a section in the choir, nor land the huge contract, but we can all excel at the assignments we have and the roles we are asked to play. Surely this applies to all of living, including what we do within the church.

The third person I met at that meeting was a young Russian Orthodox Bishop - young I can say because he is 4 years my junior! Very Russian, very committed to his culture and his church - Bishop Kirill was a brilliant man of warmth and scholarship. As a Bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church, he could not marry - clearly we was wedded to his church! We enjoyed walks and meals together, his heavy Russian accent making most colourful our English dialogue. He wanted to know about Vancouver, the Assembly location, its programs and so on… What would be the daily schedule, what would be the theme of the Assembly, who would be the impressive speakers invited from Canada and abroad, where would the delegations be housed, what facilities could be booked for hospitality events and so on… he had to know all of this so as to inform his Archbishop in charge of the Russian Delegation. Kirill was a busy young man. In those days, he divided his time between Geneva where he was the official representative of the Russian Orthodox Church and St Petersburg (still called Leningrad then) where he was a professor in the seminary. But I learned from Kirill, that the details on planning to meet and work together as churches is most important - participants must know that their efforts can be focused on the issues not on the logistics which enable the meeting.

The interesting aside to this story of Bishop Kirill is unfolding next weekend in Moscow. In the 80s and 90s and into this decade Kirill rose up through the Russian orthodox hierarchy. He was soon elevated as an Archbishop, then a Metropolitan (the highest office below that of Patriarch). He also maintained his responsibilities as a leader in the External Affairs Dept. of the Russian Orthodox Church. He is now the Chairman of the External Affairs Dept. which means he has led the dialogue and working relationship with the Roman Catholic Church and with the many member churches of the World Council of Church. It also overseas the working relationship with all of the sub-units of the Russian Orthodox Church. This is vitally important role because, for example, of the political dynamics between Russia and the Ukraine and with the rest of Europe.

When I read the news in early December of the death of the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church: Alexy II, I wondered to myself if this would affect Metropolitan Kirill… so I searched from news via the Internet - only to find - to my surprise - that Kirill was appointed as the Interim Leader of the Russian Orthodox Church until January 27, when a successor to Alexy will be elected and installed as Patriarch.

Obviously, Kirill must either be a leading candidate for the election as Patriarch , or is a very trusted middle-option between two favorites for the office. The Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church is clearly the most important public figure in Russian after the president and Prime Minister because the church is seen as the institution which retains the culture and ensures that the heritage of Russia remains … and Kirill just might about be that person as of next weekend.

"Ut Omnes Unum Sint" that all may be one - declares the Gospel and our Rood Beam. I feel blessed to have had those three friendships over the years - and I feel greatly blessed to be part of a church which seeks to follow the gospel imperative to bring Christians together - not for the sake of the church - but for the sake of God's world, and the ministry of Jesus Christ. As our UCC Creed declares - in part: "We are not alone, we live in God's world. We believe in God: who works in us and others by the Spirit. We trust in God. We are not alone. Thanks be to God."

Sermon Resources: John 17: 20-24.

 



 

Back to Top

 


Shaughnessy Heights United Church congregation is a Christian faith community respecting each other in our diversity and reaching out to all who seek God’s love.

1550 West 33rd Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V6M 1A7
Canada SEE MAP

Tel: 604-261-6377
Email: admin@shuc.ca


Copyright © 2003 Shaughnessy Heights United Church
Send feedback to admin@shuc.ca. Report problems to webmaster@shuc.ca.

Site Use Disclaimer
.